To prologue or not to prologue, that is the question. Readers, please weigh in!


Personally, I love prologues. They get you right into the action whether it was in the past or something exciting that is to come. But that’s exactly why most agents’ blogs I’ve read say not to use them. Paraphrasing…“If you need a prologue, then your story must not be strong enough…”

Hmmwell, I like them, and I use them. But I’m curious what readers think, and I’d love you to weigh in. AND, if you have some great examples, please leave the title in the comment section.

Nowhere’s what I’ve noticed.

Plenty of bestselling books have used them, even though they aren’t always called prologues. Same diff in my opinion. My biggest example is ‘Twilight’. If that little blurb wasn’t in the beginning, I don’t think I would have made it through the first chapter.

How about movies? I don’t watch a lot. But I’ve started to notice how many have “prologues”. I also don’t have cable, but I have NetFlix, and hubby has just started watching ‘Breaking Bad’. OkayI am too. And I NEVER watch TV. But the show is like a train wreck; you simply can’t look away. 

Anyway, every show has a prologue, something that will make sense midway through the forty-seven minute episode.

And since it’s sitting on my desk, I looked and noticed that Nicholas Sparks used a prologue in his bestselling book, ‘The Last Song’, which I loved by the way. Great book for teens. Did I ever mention I have a bad case of AADD? I dosorryback to the blog.

So if bestselling authors and blockbuster movies use them, why are they considered to be no-no’s with aspiring authors?

Again, this question is going out to the community of writers, agents, publishers, and especially readers. I really want your thoughts.


Almost all my stories have prologues. The first one in She Belongs to Me is probably way too long and should have been the first chapter, but that's how we learn. The rest are short and are just used to set up the story. Please check them out and see for yourself. :)

Update!!! While reading the other day...I saw something I loved! Now...I've seen Chapter 'Titles' many times, but I've never seen a book written only with Chapter Titles...no numbers. Didn't bother me one bit! So I got to thinking... Cool...that means no more 'To Prologue or not to Prologue'. I still haven't deleted my chapter numbers yet, but I thought... Why not just tell readers...'Three Days Ago...' and then tell them the rest of the story?

Any thoughts on that? 

Until next time, happy reading!

Carmen 


Thank you for stopping by my place and reading my musings. Remember, these are just my opinions and shouldn’t be taken too seriously. If you have questions, please feel free to leave them in the comment section, and I promise you I will answer.  If you’re curious about what I write, please visit one of my author pages, where you can read all about my novels and short stories. And hey, I’ll even give you a free book just for stopping by.

If it isn’t available free in your area, use…

47 comments:

  1. I love prologues and have one in my novel which I'll be submitting soon. I had a editor look at the first three chapters of my novel at a writing conference and he liked it because it set the scene for the crime that was being investigated immediately on page one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yay! One vote for prologues. Any examples of popular bestsellers you can think of that you thought the prologue made it better, or enticed you to read?

      And good luck with your submission. :)

      Delete
  2. I say yes to prologues. I love them. Not everyone reads them but that is okay. As long as the story can make sense without the prologue, you're golden. ;o)

    I've even read blogs where agents said NEVER write a series. So my question regarding agents on most topics such as these is: Are they nuts? lol Not all agents get it, but that is another topic for another blog for another time. ;o)

    Off the top of my head, I can't think of any example where the prologue was absolutely vital to the rest of the book. Again, as long as the rest of the book makes sense without it, I say you're good to go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Uh-oh! That could be a problem with me... LOL! My first novel 'She Belongs to Me' has one of those long movie prologues. If the reader doesn't read it, they *will* be confused. Hmmm...intersting point. The rest of my prologues are rather short and though they offer information, I guess you could read without. I'll keep that in mind in the future.

      As for series... I love series... Though, I do like reading a series that can be a standalone without the author feeling the need to give me tons of 'information dump'. I read one series, and I did like it, but the author felt the need to describe the house in every book. I felt cheated of reading time. If the other readers hadn't read the first one, that was their fault. LOL! But as you said, will save that for another time. :)

      Delete
  3. I do love prologues. I just read the prologue to Sweet Salt Air by Barbara Delinsky and i can't wait to read the book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooh...that's what I like to hear. That means it gripped you. I was just telling a reader the other day that I couldn't get into the 'Hunger Games'. I'm trying, but I'm having a hard time getting past the morning routine, fat cat, and descriptions. Don't get me wrong; I love to know my characters intimately, but I need a reason to get to know them. I will finish it eventually. I'm up to the point that they're getting ready for the 'reaping', so maybe I'll get past that part finally, since I hear it is such a great read. :)

      Delete
    2. Since someone was just asking me about this post, I was looking through the comments. I'd like to say that I set down the first book in the Hunger Games no less than ten times. I finally made it to the reaping, and I never put it down again. Well, other than to eat and sleep. I loved it. I was invested in the characters, and I wanted to know what was going to happen. BUT...I had to get hooked before I became invested. Even though I was learning about the main character in the first chapter, I didn't really care, but the moment something tragic happened, I couldn't look away. So...there's the train wreck again... It seems to me that whether it's the first chapter or the prologue, it should be relevant and hook the reader so they can't look away. :)

      Delete
  4. i'm a fan of prologues. i think they set the tone for the book/show and if the story starts to veer away you have some point to guide you back!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That makes sense. I notice I often forget about the prologue right about the time it shows up.

      I thought of a good example while reading everyone's comments. "The Bounty Hunter". I think that was the title of the movie with Gerard Butler and Jennifer Aniston. That prologue wasn't necessary at all, but it was funny. You wanted to know how it happened, but we would have understood the characters and the storyline without it. It was a hook...not that you needed one with those two actors. :)

      Delete
  5. I like prologues. Not every story needs them, but sometimes it helps to get you hooked, wondering what will happen later, how the story will get to that point, or tell you something about the characters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! I'm glad you do too, since I'm rather fond of them as you know. :)

      Delete
  6. As a reader I'm a bit indifferent to prologues. I always read them if they're there, and they never annoy me, but I can't say I'm all excited about prologues.

    As I writer I think they're a useful tool to give a sneak peak into the past or future. I use mine to give a little backstory to my character, to establish a bit of why she is the way she is.

    If a prologue has a purpose then great. If not then maybe you should consider why it's there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good point, Christine. I agree completely.

      Delete
  7. I like prologues and use them in my writing. A prologue, when well written, can be a momentary window into the soul of a character, a set up of drama yet to unfold, or back story that sets up the main story in the book without the author having to take pages of info and work it into an action scene, conversation, or thoughts. It's pointing your reader to exactly what they need to know.

    As far as examples of good use, I'd have to agree with the Twilight prologue. Hearing Bella say that what was about to come would lead to her sacrifice is what makes the story interesting. If we just opened with her getting of the plane and riding into Forks with her dad and the drab conversation held, I'm sure many readers would have put it down and we would not have been blessed (lol) with the Twilight series. Apparently the agent knew exactly when to use it and scored big!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again, a good point. And though most of us are all authors, we are ALL readers. So...so far, it looks as though "to prologue" is the winner.

      But I'm enjoying the "how" to prologue. Great feedback, friends. :)

      Delete
  8. I like prologues and agree with every word you say. Sure, we could call it Chapter 1, but a prologue is a special part of the book that, IMO, gives readers anticipation of what's to come. But that's only if it's done well, as is true for any scene. I've been off and on about my prologue, too, but I think I'll keep it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Angela. And feel free to post a link to your prologue...as long as it is PG13. We'd love to read your example. Mine are all on my blog by the way. Under each tab, I always add a link to my first excerpt.

      Good luck with your prose.

      :)

      Delete
  9. I don't have a problem with prologues and often find that when they are used and done right, it's a great way to pull the reader (or movie go-er in...and I totally agree with you on Breaking Bad!!). In my first novel I used a prologue - kind of taking an action scene from the middle of the book and starting with that, then having the first chapter take us back to the beginning and leading back up to that same exact scene I used in the prologue. I didn't use one in my second book (my current WIP) but I think that they have to feel right and work with the story in a certain way. I too have read how they are a big no-no, but like you said, if the big guys are using them, and using them successfully, then why can't those who are still learning or getting started?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly, Michelle!

      Question... and something I'm running into on my fifth novel, which I already wrote; I just need to edit...

      In your use of the scene from the middle of the book, do you repeat yourself with the same scene, or do you remind the reader subtly that you are back to this point. I'm told DO NOT repeat yourself. And in my first book, I don't. But it was easy because I take you back to the future several times, so there is never any confusion.

      In my fifth book however...it is strictly a teaser, and I felt the need to copy and paste the scene identical. It's very short and my beta, who originally said absolutely no before she read it, changed her mind afterward.

      So...now we have another question for the group. My thoughts would be normally you should be able to skip ahead, but if it's super short, you might be able to get away in reminding the reader what situation they are in.

      Good luck on your new release!

      Delete
  10. It depends on the book. I yanked out the prologue from my book because every important plot point in that was in the prologue (even though it had taken place twenty five years earlier) was revealed within the first chapter of the book anyway though brief and tantalizing mysterious sounds in the night, conversations, etc. By yanking out the prologue, I dumped the reader straight into the action and it seems to have to worked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which is sometimes the same thing... And... I guess what agents are stating, that you should be able to propel a reader right into the action. If it works, great!

      I guess in the case of my first prologue (She Belongs to Me), I used the prologue more like a teaser, a mystery, and then I went back and built up what led to the night of the prologue.

      But in my next two prologues...I actually took the readers to the past, using the prologue to describe what life-event shaped my protagonist's life.

      This is great, everyone. You guys are helping me figure out why and what I like about my own prologues. LOL!

      What's the title of your book, Jade? I'd love to see your example. :)

      Delete
  11. I personally think prologues are a great way to set up the action and tease what's to come. I think they're especially effective with suspense/mystery novels. My guess is the reason so many agents don't like them is sometimes they're too long. I took a writing class this summer where one of the students had a 15 page prologue, so really, it was more like a chapter (and a long one at that!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, Bianca. And technically, my first prologue was too long, but it probably fell under one of those long movie scenes where you forget that you are watching a prologue and all of the sudden you are launched five years into the past. And honestly, when I queried, I called it the first chapter, not the prologue. I know...bad girl... But I didn't want to turn publishers off. I figured they could call it whatever they wanted when the time came. And yay...as it turns out, my publisher named it a prologue, even added two scenes I'd deleted back into it. :)

      Delete
  12. Vote no for me. I like to be tossed right into the story--at the deep end, if possible. Prologues seem to me pussy-footing around instead of getting on with it. Of course, if you write one, you know I'll read it and probably like it anyway. . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cool... one 'no' ... So now I have to ask, do you write also? I'm just curious if it is your reading standpoint as well as your writing opinion.

      But...I'm glad to hear you read them. It scared me to hear that some readers don't read prologues. Because I assume if they are there, they are integral to the story.

      Thank you for commenting, Ron.

      Delete
  13. I don't like prologues, or epilogues for that matter. Just give me the story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your input, Carol.

      I took a peek at your website and it looks as though you are an avid reader / reviewer, so I definitely appreciate your feedback.

      I understand your direct comment..."just get to the story", but I would also love more information of 'why?'. Since I am prone to use both prologues and epilogues in my writing, I covet more information.

      Do you feel they aren't a part of the story?
      Do they detract?
      And lastly...do you like to start off with action or do you like getting to know a character before reading about any of their issues?

      One of my beta readers insisted I read "Safe Harbor" by Nicholas Sparks---of course with the assurance that it wasn't one of the cry-your-eyes-out-for-hours type of ending, my standard question when she suggests a Sparks' book.

      Anyway, the book was very good, though different. However, I honestly believe if I had written and queried his beginning chapter, it wouldn't have made it past the mail room floor. And though I enjoy getting to know a character intimately, I admit that even I might have put it down if it hadn't come highly recommended.

      So...therein lies the problem I think with unknown authors and the reason they often resort to prologues... They feel as though they must 'dazzle' the prospective reader.

      Thank you again for stopping by. I hope you'll find time to add additional feedback. I'm going to visit a little more on your blog. :)

      Delete
  14. Hmmm. Don't think I can add much to all the feedback you've received here, but I didn't want to not comment, so--here goes. Like any other part of a story, a prologue needs to carry its weight. It can't be superfluous, and my test for that is whether it could have been Ch 1. If it could, then it *should*. The way a prologue works for me is if it throws me into a scene that raises more questions than it answers, that engages me with the characters in an unputdownable way. Then Ch 1 *must* start somewhere else, not as a continuation of the prologue. Someone above said "not every story needs one, and I agree with that too. When it comes to agents and publishers, I guess the reason they dislike prologues is because a prologue offers an easy way to hook a reader: take the most exciting scene of your novel and smack it at the beginning--voilá, instant hook. In order for a prologue to work, the story that it introduces, and the writing, must be strong enough to stand up on its own, not use the prologue as a crutch. My two cents--plugged pennies at that :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great comments. I'll have to take more time, reread, and comment tomorrow.

      My brain juices are fried at the moment.

      But I thought they were great and definitely added to the discussion.

      :)

      Delete
    2. I agree, Guilie. And that is how I feel I use my prologues, the first one definitely! There was no other way that I was willing to write it. I did feel pressure to spread the scene over the entire book as flashbacks, but I'd graciously declined--not really...I stomped by feet and pouted. It was not how I wanted to write the book. The prologue was a must in my mind, and then I took the reader back five years.

      But in the same instance...my third book, 'Entangled Dreams', there was absolutely no need for the prologue. I could have easily worked in the few tidbits I wrote into the first chapter. BUT...I did it because I wrote the book as a modern-day fairytale and wanted to make the prologue sound as if it had been narrated. Again, maybe not the best idea, but one of the benefits of publishing with a smaller pub, they spoil you, let you have your way. LOL!

      I can tell you one thing. In the future, I am going to be very cautious about using prologues. I've used one in all six of my published stories, and number seven has one too. But the new series I'm writing...I listened to my betas and I'm skipping the prologue--and even skipping the first chapter. Per my beta readers' great advice, I am doing as Ron and Carol suggested--jumping right into the story! Cheers!

      Delete
  15. I like prologues. In my NaNo story I wrote last year, I had a prologue...and it was the show what happened that led to chapter 1. In ANY book I read, this would be acceptable but you would find out what happened before without it as you read the story. I guess I like knowing what happened and watching the readers deal with it, rather than picking up bits and pieces through the story. But in general, I like prologues and I like epilogues....because I like lots of information :)

    www.cassandrajaney.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm with you, Cassandra, I love a lot of information, but I'm not so good at reading information dump all at once. As much as I do like to know what makes a character 'tick', I really do love a good prologue telling me why I want to know why they're 'ticking' in the first place. Often a prologue brings me right to the heart of the problem, which makes me want to read more.

      As I'm working through all of these comments, it seems prologues are coming across as a continuation of the 'book flap'. With so many books available nowadays, if you are not one of the authors I'll read just because you wrote a book, it's a valuable tool. Thank you for your comment. :)

      Delete
    2. By the way, Cassandra Janey. My first book, SHE BELONGS TO ME's main character's name is Jaynee. My second book, LAND OF THE NOONDAY SUN's main character is Cassandra.

      What a coincidence? For a second, I was wondering if my characters really were coming to life and talking to me. LOL!

      Delete
    3. :D That's pretty neat! It's my real name so I find that rather amusing, lol.

      Delete
  16. I'm not a fan of prologues. They seem like a cheap trick to me. I feel the author is trying to get me hooked on the story, and that method fails 10 times out of 10 for me because I'm dumped into a tense situation involving characters I don't yet care about. That being said, if you like prologues, rock on! I know there are readers who love prologues as much as I dislike them!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very good point! Again...where writers struggle between the perfect balance between information dump and intriguing information.

      Delete
  17. Here's what I was taught by my writing instructors about prologues: "If the information in the prologue is vital to the story, it belongs in the story, not as a prologue. If the story can still be full and rich without the prologue, then the prologue works as a prologue." Why? Because about 50% of readers do not read the prologue (And I know this is true, because I used to be one of those prologue-skippers until a few years ago). What does this mean to an author? Well, it's obvious: If what you've written into your prologue is vital to the story, and your reader skips it, guess what? The reader will not "get" your story.

    It's easy to say, "Well, that's the reader's fault. They should have read the prologue." No. It's the author's job to know their audience and to use the writing tools they're given correctly so that readers won't be left in the dark. Knowing that 50% of readers will likely skip the prologue, an author would be careless to then put vital information in the prologue just because they "like writing prologues." That is a recipe for failure and shows the author doesn't care about their readers. Can you tell I am a huge reader advocate? :)

    I'm a writer, and this is a quote I wrote recently on my own blog: "It doesn't matter how much YOU like your story. It only matters how much the READERS like it." And that includes ALL components of a story. Something else I wrote on that same blog post: "If a scene in your book doesn't contribute to the main story line, or detracts from it, it needs to go, no matter how fabulous you think it is." This includes prologues. An author might think the prologue they have written is the bee's knees. It's a work of art to be cherished forever. But if the prologue does not suit the purposes of a real prologue, meaning that it is non-essential to the main story that begins with Chapter One, and that the info contained within it is vital to the book, the prologue has to go, and the material in it needs to be incorporated into the story.

    That's what I was taught by more than one published author and writing instructor, and that's what my continuing education continues to teach me. I figure these Big Six instructors and editors know more than I do, so I'm going to listen to them and make sure my prologues are actually prologues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great feedback! And I'm is seriously big trouble if readers don't read my prologue in 'She Belongs to Me'. In hindsight, I guess I could have called it chapter one, but because I take the reader back five years, I decided to call it a prologue. I honestly never considered that readers would skip a prologue. I guess because I'm such an avid reader myself and never want to miss anything, I would never think to skip.

      Thank you for all the great info, and I will certainly make sure I'm careful in the future.

      I will also run over to your post when I have a moment. :)



      Delete
  18. I love prologues as a reader just as much as a writer. I don't get why agents make the fuss they do, it's simply unnecessary. I know some readers do skip over them, but in my opinion they miss out. I say that because if a book has a prologue I generally get all wrapped up in the book from the very beginning, because of the info offered to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Sara! I agree. And funny, as a reader, the more words there are the better for me. I can't imagine skipping over the prologue. And OMG, if they do it on my first book, they won't have a clue. In hindsight, I should have just called it chapter one. I may do that when I get my rights back. LOL! BUT...I caved under the pressure of the publisher for my next book. They recommended cutting the prologue AND the first chapter. I'm still not sure if it was the right thing to do, but I did it. I still have them, though. In fact, I shared the prologue with another website, so it'll be available to read soon. So...that's one good thing about not using the prologue: marketing material. Cheers! Have an awesome day! :)

      Delete
  19. Ooh...this was nice. Christine actually did research that I didn't, so I wanted to add it to the list. On her site, she lists many of the 'popular' novels by authors who broke this 'supposed' taboo and used a prologue. Go figure!

    http://writeonthewater.com/?p=13566

    ReplyDelete
  20. The late Elmore Leonard, in his famous 10 rules of writing, simply said you should avoid them although he never went into why, precisely. I use prologues in every one of my novels. They help set the mood, tone, the plot, introductions to characters, etc. Prologues (and maybe epilogues) are also really the only reason to use 2nd person, the only one of the three that cannot be indefinitely sustained. I don't apologize one bit for using prologues and, Elmore Leonard notwithstanding, what it all comes down to when people advise not using them is a subjective prejudice or bias against them. It's not to be confused with all-knowing, infallible judgment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, Robert. From all the comments, it seems as though if prologues or epilogues are extra information, setting the stage, increasing the tension, or grabbing the reader, they definitely serve a purpose. I know I messed up on my first book, but my others I believe were well placed, and as you, I will continue to use them--or at least write them. In my current release, I wrote a prologue and a first chapter, but per the suggestion of an acquiring agent at Random House, I dropped both and worked them into what was originally chapter two...hopefully without making it appear as information dump. I'm still not sure about the decision. I believe the first two chapters set up the book, allowed readers to understand *why* my character did what she did with their own eyes instead of just hearing snippets of her past. If you saw her on the street, holding her dead mother after a robber shoved a knife into her mother's chest, or when she was sixteen and her date drugged her, planning to rape her, you might understand why she'd want to jump off a bridge in the current first chapter. LOL!

      BUT...that's what we do; live and learn. The good thing is...I can still use the information. Prior to release, I posted the 'deleted' chapters, so they worked like a movie trailer. Also, Wattpad is a great place to post these types of excerpts.

      I learned a lot from this post, but the greatest thing I learned was that, as you mentioned, *the author* has to decide. There is no right or wrong when writing--other than the basic writing rules--if it forwards the story, just do it! :

      I wrote another article you may find interesting on this subject. For that matter, I'm always rambling about something and love feedback. All my articles are listed at the top of the site under the 'writing posts' tab.

      Thank you for stopping by--and responding--as it is never too late; this is a topic that will probably never die.

      Cheers!

      Here's the post: Forget the supposed 'writing' rules and write a great story! http://www.carmendesousa.com/2013/10/ever-read-post-on-writing-great-book.html

      Delete
  21. Wonderful post!

    What's that old adage? "Leave the blood on the drawing room floor first"? From there you can work forward, or backward in the story.
    The prologue should be short, and then maybe introduced with a time change before chapter one. But the story has to hook back into it as a thread, not as a standalone.

    I'm for them, if they work in a POV.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Cait! And thank you for your feedback. I think you are exactly correct!

      I've never heard that exact adage, but I love it! And yes, that's what I try to do... Some of my prologues, sadly, are a little too long, but I think I know how to fix that. I'll be freshening up my books next month, something I think we all need to do at some point. It's amazing how quickly books become outdated in this day and age of fashion and technology.

      Good luck in your travels, my friend. :)

      Delete
  22. Not sure if anyone is still following this post or is interested, but just in case... I wanted to share.

    While reading the other day...I saw something I loved! Now...I've seen Chapter 'Titles' many times, but I've never seen a book written only with Chapter Titles...no numbers. Didn't bother me one bit! So, I got to thinking... Cool...that means no more 'To Prologue or not to Prologue'. I still haven't deleted my chapter numbers yet, but I thought... Why not just tell readers...'Three Days Ago...' and then tell them the rest of the story?

    Any thoughts on that?

    ReplyDelete